more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 10778

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / G. Quantification / 6. Plural Quantification ]

Full Idea

According to its supporters, second-order logic allow us to pay the ontological price of a mere first-order theory and get the corresponding monadic second-order theory for free.

Clarification

'Monadic' means predicates and relations have the minimum number of places

Gist of Idea

Can second-order logic be ontologically first-order, with all the benefits of second-order?

Source

Øystein Linnebo (Plural Quantification Exposed [2003], §0)

Book Ref

-: 'Nous' [-], p.71


The 32 ideas from Øystein Linnebo

Mathematics is the study of all possible patterns, and is thus bound to describe the world [Linnebo]
Logical truth is true in all models, so mathematical objects can't be purely logical [Linnebo]
Game Formalism has no semantics, and Term Formalism reduces the semantics [Linnebo]
The axioms of group theory are not assertions, but a definition of a structure [Linnebo]
To investigate axiomatic theories, mathematics needs its own foundational axioms [Linnebo]
Naïve set theory says any formula defines a set, and coextensive sets are identical [Linnebo]
You can't prove consistency using a weaker theory, but you can use a consistent theory [Linnebo]
In classical semantics singular terms refer, and quantifiers range over domains [Linnebo]
'Some critics admire only one another' cannot be paraphrased in singular first-order [Linnebo]
Predicates are 'distributive' or 'non-distributive'; do individuals do what the group does? [Linnebo]
Second-order quantification and plural quantification are different [Linnebo]
Plural plurals are unnatural and need a first-level ontology [Linnebo]
Ordinary speakers posit objects without concern for ontology [Linnebo]
A pure logic is wholly general, purely formal, and directly known [Linnebo]
Plural quantification may allow a monadic second-order theory with first-order ontology [Linnebo]
Instead of complex objects like tables, plurally quantify over mereological atoms tablewise [Linnebo]
Traditionally we eliminate plurals by quantifying over sets [Linnebo]
We speak of a theory's 'ideological commitments' as well as its 'ontological commitments' [Linnebo]
Can second-order logic be ontologically first-order, with all the benefits of second-order? [Linnebo]
A comprehension axiom is 'predicative' if the formula has no bound second-order variables [Linnebo]
A 'pure logic' must be ontologically innocent, universal, and without presuppositions [Linnebo]
The modern concept of an object is rooted in quantificational logic [Linnebo]
Plural quantification depends too heavily on combinatorial and set-theoretic considerations [Linnebo]
Structuralism is right about algebra, but wrong about sets [Linnebo]
'Deductivist' structuralism is just theories, with no commitment to objects, or modality [Linnebo]
Non-eliminative structuralism treats mathematical objects as positions in real abstract structures [Linnebo]
'Modal' structuralism studies all possible concrete models for various mathematical theories [Linnebo]
'Set-theoretic' structuralism treats mathematics as various structures realised among the sets [Linnebo]
An 'intrinsic' property is either found in every duplicate, or exists independent of all externals [Linnebo]
In mathematical structuralism the small depends on the large, which is the opposite of physical structures [Linnebo]
Structuralism differs from traditional Platonism, because the objects depend ontologically on their structure [Linnebo]
There may be a one-way direction of dependence among sets, and among natural numbers [Linnebo]